In the Fujinon lens group, the XF56 is a stand-out product, the only autofocus lens with an F1.2 large aperture, a unique parameter specification must be said to be a rich family treasures.
XF 56_ Taobao search sales ranking s.taobao.com direct link This camera is a landmark for me who has entered the Fujikeng pit for three reasons:
First of all, its specifications are tempting. The large aperture is a salvation for the APSC Lens Group, which allows the high-density sensor to absorb more light while maintaining a compact size.
Second, I need an outdoor portrait lens. Compared with the XF90 F2, it has better solidifying force and a more tolerant safe shutter range (shorter focal length). For example, the same photographer needs the same 1 Under the object illumination of /125s-1/200s, the XF56 output rate will be significantly higher than the XF90, because this degree of shutter speed is higher than the safe shutter speed of XF56 (84mm viewing angle), and for the XF90 (135mm viewing angle) ) It is only just getting to the bottom line. The tolerance of the safety shutter is more important to me. After all, the outdoor light environment is changeable. The child loves to run. Under the first second sun, the next second is under the shade. eat.
Third, the value of Yan Yanyan, the 62mm caliber, and the watery eyes, the appearance of solid, dark green and purple red coating hair color, volume is not bloated, these are my determination Hand factor.
Excellent workmanship, excellent quality, weight sense pressure.
The metal knurled focusing ring is very delicate in touch, and the rotation damping needs to be slightly smaller. Otherwise, it is easy to accidentally touch and cause the focus to move slightly. I wonder if it is an individual phenomenon.
The aperture ring is made of plastic, and the position of the gear that rotates is obvious. It is OK to confirm it in Fuji head. By the way, the DG42.5mmF1.2 of Matsuzaka was recently played. The sense of denseness of the goods and the damping of the aperture ring position were even better than the XF56. Of course, the tonnage is even bigger and fatter. After all, it has an anti-shake mechanism.
The caliber of the XF56 is 62mm and it has good filter adaptability.
When focusing on the X-T1, the focusing speed is not slow, and it is easy to focus when the spot frame area is too small (the spot size can be set in the spot area). However, the focusing noise is slightly larger, which is similar to that of the XF23mm F1.4.
In the X-T1 and below fuselage, you dare to use AF-C to catch the focus, so that the acid will be unforgettable. I use AF-S single focus. What can be shared here is AF-S, put the composition in the brain in advance to set a good focus position, the focus area can not be too small, to ensure the focus speed. I'm sorry to mention again Matsuzaka DG42.5, with GX-8, focusing speed a street, quiet two streets, mainly the lens of the DC motor + body driven with the pot.
If it is really unhappy, the way to improve is to change the body, with the X-T2, X-Pro2, X-T20 this new computing-driven kernel machine.
Is your soft coin printing? Oh no, promise?
X-t2_ Taobao search X-T2 or wait and see it s.taobao.com direct link So I wait and see the lower prices. If the X-T20 has nothing to do with this fault door, the X-T2's fault door dust settles and then considers upgrading.
You see, I'm not rational? (Manually funny)
This part is not more nonsense, went straight to the theme!
Let's start with a close up shot. I believe that the solidity of the image near the nearest focusing distance is not available at the time of full opening. It will be good to receive a pass and close the contrast and resolution of the two files. All of them can be shown well.
If you don't, let's try to retreat...
Simply open the aperture and take a long distance.
It can be seen that with a slight increase in the object distance, the resolution and contrast under full aperture are gradually increasing.
As far as the distance is concerned, I will look for two pictures for you to see. Of course, it must be full of aperture!
Can only say two words, excellent.
When the focus is on the center of the screen when the distance is fully opened, the water is not dragged, and even if it is enlarged to 400%, there is no blurring on the edge.
The entire open edge is a deliberate investigation of the entire person, and the results are acceptable. There is a slight adhesiveness and there is no confusion. Mainly at the details such as the chain's contrast performance decreased significantly.
It seems that the tolerance space for this head is still very wide. Designers have worked hard. While maintaining a 62mm volume, their performance is relatively balanced.
In the fully open state, the front face is just not perfect and it is weak.
Ultra-fast civil lenses are highly contrasted at the full open front, and probably only the highly modified, high-stack ZEISS OTUS series can calm down.
The rest is the metaphysics that I don’t want to mention, but I don’t talk about, but not out of fashion...
When online masters discuss lens metaphysics, they mostly seem to revolve around the atmosphere, presence, color, and color.
For the performance of the XF56, I summed up this shot as far as possible not to beat the light, the light environment is slightly darker, but it is more likely to make the color. Its depth of field is less than the 85mmF1.8 of the full width, but I like the resolution of it. If I grasp it well, I may surprise myself unexpectedly.
In a cloudy, cloudy, shaded environment that can cause high saturation and coloration, the probability of this shot will be much greater.
In this can share with you my settings: focus area according to the situation change area, spot metering and exposure compensation according to the EVF live in -2 ~ +1EV move, AUTO ISO set the safety shutter bottom line 1/125s, RAW + JPG. As far as the aperture is concerned, 99% of my cases are screwed to F1.2.
These photos are all shot in full. After the end of the post, the map will be uploaded separately so that everyone can click to enlarge
According to my personal experience, the depth of field of the XF56 is comparable to the full width of 2.0. The feeling of opening is similar to the full width of 2.4-2.8. The quality of the opening is very general, with perceivable bilinearity, and the edge of the light is not smooth. Soft, so Fuji came out with an APD version again. Before purchasing the regular version 56, I repeatedly checked the online comparison stickers. The two linears didn't improve much, and my body was X-T1, focusing was no longer powerful. APD Not only lost the amount of light, but also lost the phase focus function, which is not acceptable for me to shoot baby with X-T1, so it is still a normal version of the road.
Mechanical quality level: in the Fuji family is the upper and middle level, exquisite workmanship fine materials, the aperture ring of the stall to confirm the sense can be more crisp and a little, the focus ring rotation damping can be stronger, some even better. Thanks to the amount of light, focusing is not slow or the noise is much higher than the current motor of the family. If students are used to 18-55, 16-55, 50-140, they need to adapt to the vibration and decibels.
Optical quality level: close-range shooting quality can only be said to be acceptable, need to receive two files aperture to reflect the details and micro contrast, full open sharp situation occurs in the middle distance (full body kids, half adult), the performance of the vision is fully open, It can be said that the purpose of the designer is very strong, optimize the full-scale performance of the object distance after two meters. As for dispersion, although the software can remove but still reflect the hard quality, after all, when looking at the specification sheet, the two large-size ED glasses on the front end really surprise me, but the reality is still quite edgy.... .. Keke ... As for the ASP glass ... If not, the quality of the background will certainly be a lot better, for size, endure ... ...
My summary is that, as a Fuji user, unless the zoom road is really in the end, or the lens can try to taste, this dish is really not the same, the fuselage priority recommendations X-Pro2, X-T2, X-T20, drive The motor is not hard.
At first, it was impressed by its facial value and specifications. Although it was not the perfect ideal lover but it was also unique in style, I wanted it to be perfect with Matsushita 42.5, with a solid and delicate feel and a quiet focus, but also to maintain its current stature. Fat and thin.
Calmly think, how can there be perfection? How can the world have the best of both worlds? Only blame for one moment is not enough, one hand 56 one hand 42.5 chaos I want to. It's a blessing to be able to enjoy the lustrous shots of Matsuzaka Fulong.
Start to map.
The end of the full text, welcome to leave a message discussion, thank you ~!
The USB 3.2 specification absorbed all prior 3.x specifications. USB 3.2 identifies three transfer rates – 20Gbps, 10Gbps, and 5Gbps.
Key characteristics of the USB 3.2 specification include:
Defines multi-lane operation for new USB 3.2 hosts and devices, allowing for up to two lanes of 10Gbps operation to realize a 20Gbps data transfer rate, without sacrificing cable length
Delivers compelling performance boosts to meet requirements for demanding USB storage, display, and docking applications
Continued use of existing USB physical layer data rates and encoding techniques
Minor update to hub specification to address increased performance and assure seamless transitions between single and two-lane operation
Improved data encoding for more efficient data transfer leading to higher through-put and improved I/O power efficiency
Backwards compatible with all existing USB products; will operate at lowest common speed capability
Usb 3.2 Cable,Usb Type-C Cable,5Gbps Usb Type-C Cable,10Gbps Usb Type-C Cable
UCOAX , https://www.ucoax.com