Why is Russia not afraid of American weapons? Especially F-35
F-35 over-tech
Surprise! A Russian military expert Drezdenko interviewed by the Russian media said that the US F-35 stealth fighter is too complex and expensive, and that excessive high-tech loopholes are too great.
It's hard to believe, isn't it?
Although the expert's statement may be seen as a propaganda that devalues ​​the performance of the F-35, it perfectly illustrates how Russia and the West view the non-existent concept of weapon technology.
Drezdenko said that F-35 is a very complex system, so there are many loopholes and other problems, it is very difficult to debug, all of which is because it is an over-high-tech aircraft.
This view sounds familiar?
Or like the F-4 ghost and the MiG-21.
-F-4
It can be said that the MiG-21 was one of the most equipped fighters in the world at that time. It was sold to more than 50 countries. The MiG-21 fighter jets and their improved versions were produced in more than 10,000 aircraft. As of May 3, 2013 Used in 52 countries and has undergone many large-scale and important improvements. During the Vietnam War, the MiG-21, known as the "fish nest," defeated the American F-4 "ghosts." At that time, the F-4 "Phantom" fighter was equipped with air-to-air missiles and air-to-ground weapons.
MiG-21
In this matchup, no one was optimistic about the MiG-21 at first. However, the results were unexpected. From May to December 1966, 47 U.S. planes were shot down, while the MiG-21 lost only 12, a ratio of 4:1.
The reason is that the United States believes that the aviation artillery has been eliminated, so no aerial artillery was installed on the F-4 in the Vietnam battlefield. In close combat, the MiG-21 fully embodies its agile performance, using a simple cannon to approach from the rear repeatedly at supersonic speeds, launching an attack at an absolute superior position to shoot down the F-4 fighter.
T-34
The Soviet Union also made the same argument before 1943, when a large number of simple T-34 tanks faced the powerful and expensive German Tiger tanks. T-34 is more maneuverable than Tiger, and there are more than Tiger. Other firepower, armor, control, etc. are not as powerful as a tiger.
Or, like the American M-16 and the Soviet AK-47, the AK-47 has become a generation of gun kings, and people of all colors on the battlefield like it because it is not arrogant, cheap and easy to maintain. AK47 is low in cost and powerful in firepower. The total number of AK series assault rifles has exceeded 50 million in the world, ranking first; the second is the US M16 assault rifle, which has a total of 7.5 million, which is much less.
The Americans were shocked that when Russian soldiers did not get the most advanced equipment, Russia was willing to sacrifice exquisiteness for simplicity. .
Drezdenko believes that unlike Russia, Americans rely too much on stealth. However, with the rapid development of modern radar technology, stealth is no longer an inevitable guarantee of air hegemony.
Drezdenko believes that close-range air combat in today's world has not disappeared, and it is not necessarily all long-range missile attacks.
As early as the 1950s, the United States believed that the future of air warfare would be a long-range missile attack between aircraft (this proved to be a fallacy in the skies of North Vietnam). The current thinking of the United States is to use the stealth F-35 and F-22 to blow up the Russian MiG fighter jets into the sky without the MiG knowing it. But for Russia, the good days of close air combat are not over yet.
Su-35
American expert Michael Peck believes that Russian expert Drozdenko did have a point on the F-35, which would make many Americans nod their heads in agreement. Michael Peck said why Americans tolerate the F-35, a tasteless aircraft, because it is a very large and expensive business with contracts reaching trillions of dollars. Although the United States continues to manufacture F-35s, the Americans are upgrading and modernizing their fourth-generation F-18 and F-15, trying to make them on par with Russia’s Su-35.
The important thing here is not to figure out who has a better weapon, or the advantages and disadvantages of the F-35. As Drozdenko pointed out, technological advancements such as stealth are temporary.
Why did the United States and Russia have such a contrasting operational thinking?
These are concepts rooted in the history and battlefield environment of both sides. The wars of the United States in the last century have been carried out overseas. The United States can use its powerful industrial and technological resources to provide advanced tanks and fighters to the expeditionary force. For Russia's predecessor, the former Soviet Union, the last century was characterized by two huge German invasions and a large-scale war against Japan. The Soviet army mostly fought on undeveloped rugged or frozen battlefields, so the equipment was strict, requiring durable leather and not being squeamish.
Of course, these analyses may not be completely reasonable.
Su-34
Russia is indeed capable of manufacturing advanced weapons such as hypersonic missiles. Although simplicity is a virtue, it has its shortcomings. For example, the engines of Russian fighter jets wear out too quickly. Russian fighter jets do not need to have a long lifespan, and they are thrown away at the end of the fight, or in other words, most of them are completely scrapped for a few hundred hours after being on the battlefield. The United States requires a fighter jet engine to have an overhaul life of at least 1,500 hours, and the service life of a fighter jet can reach ten to twenty years. The Russians think it is not necessary at all.
American weapons may be more expensive and valuable than they need, and the Israelis have proven time and time again that high-tech precision weapons are very effective in actual combat.
Nevertheless, the United States and Russia have different views on military technology. Drozdenko said, Imagine a BMW and a Russian-made Ladaniva off-road vehicle on a bumpy road deep in Russia. Which of the two will wear out? Technology is technology, but war is war.
Pharmaceuticals,2-Methyl- Propanoic Acid Monohydrate Price,2-Methyl- Propanoic Acid Monohydrate Free Sample,Pure 2-Methyl- Propanoic Acid Monohydrate
Zhejiang Wild Wind Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. , https://www.wild-windchem.com